* FH V7 Research Notes: Shared vs New
- Gary Carson
- Famous
- Posts: 162
- Joined: 02 Mar 2016 17:46
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Grand Island, Nebraska, USA
FH V7 Research Notes: Shared vs New
My question relates to using a shared note or create a new note.
Background:
I have a number of people that I am trying to find their burial location.
I have created a Log type Research Note with a Title of Burial location retaining the header and table with headings of Date, Research Activity, and Result. On one line I prepopulated Research Activity with Search Find A Grave
I would like to add and link this note to all individuals and track each individual with varing dates and results. Can I do this with one Research Note or I have to created a new Research Note for each individaul?
Background:
I have a number of people that I am trying to find their burial location.
I have created a Log type Research Note with a Title of Burial location retaining the header and table with headings of Date, Research Activity, and Result. On one line I prepopulated Research Activity with Search Find A Grave
I would like to add and link this note to all individuals and track each individual with varing dates and results. Can I do this with one Research Note or I have to created a new Research Note for each individaul?
Gary
Win 10, FH 7.0.15
Win 10, FH 7.0.15
- ColeValleyGirl
- Megastar
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005 22:02
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire
- Contact:
Re: FH V7 Research Notes: Shared vs New
You can link a research note to as many other records (except other notes) that you like -- they behave like 'ordinary' notes with the major exception that they are excluded from reports (except reports specific to Research Notes).
Helen Wright
ColeValleyGirl's family history
ColeValleyGirl's family history
- tatewise
- Megastar
- Posts: 27088
- Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: FH V7 Research Notes: Shared vs New
You can use either one shared or separate Research Notes, but consider the long term scenario.
In the shared version, as the table grows larger and larger, how will it be managed?
Once a Research Activity has been completed will its row entry be deleted?
If you don't do that the table could become difficult to search to discover outstanding activities.
Regarding linking to Individuals (or other records) you can link in two directions.
In the Property Box of each Individual, on the Notes tab, you can Add Note > Shared Research Note for as many as you like.
Also, in the Research Note you can have a column in your table that holds links to Individual (or other) records.
The Where Used Record Links plugin (when updated to V1.5) will identify links in either direction.
In the shared version, as the table grows larger and larger, how will it be managed?
Once a Research Activity has been completed will its row entry be deleted?
If you don't do that the table could become difficult to search to discover outstanding activities.
Regarding linking to Individuals (or other records) you can link in two directions.
In the Property Box of each Individual, on the Notes tab, you can Add Note > Shared Research Note for as many as you like.
Also, in the Research Note you can have a column in your table that holds links to Individual (or other) records.
The Where Used Record Links plugin (when updated to V1.5) will identify links in either direction.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
- Gary Carson
- Famous
- Posts: 162
- Joined: 02 Mar 2016 17:46
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Grand Island, Nebraska, USA
Re: FH V7 Research Notes: Shared vs New
Can the table within a shared note be sorted?
Gary
Win 10, FH 7.0.15
Win 10, FH 7.0.15
- tatewise
- Megastar
- Posts: 27088
- Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: FH V7 Research Notes: Shared vs New
I don't think rich text tables can be sorted manually, but you could write a plugin to do it.
Anyway, the table would eventually still become extremely long and unprintable.
So maybe you would have to start a new one perhaps each year?
Anyway, the table would eventually still become extremely long and unprintable.
So maybe you would have to start a new one perhaps each year?
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
-
davepacey
- Famous
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 22 Nov 2002 19:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Lincolnshire, UK
Re: FH V7 Research Notes: Shared vs New
You can right click on a cell in the table and move the row up or down, but you have to do it for every move, ie. you cannot, as far as I can see, move multiple rows or have a short cut key.
EDIT: you could of course, paste it into excel, sort then paste it back again
Dave Pacey - Lincolnshire UK
- tatewise
- Megastar
- Posts: 27088
- Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: FH V7 Research Notes: Shared vs New
Dave, if you used that Excel workaround, would cells with hyperlinks to records & external URL be preserved? I suspect not.
Also dates prior to 1900 might pose a problem.
Also dates prior to 1900 might pose a problem.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
-
davepacey
- Famous
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 22 Nov 2002 19:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Lincolnshire, UK
Re: FH V7 Research Notes: Shared vs New
No they are not Mike, you are 100% correct
Dave Pacey - Lincolnshire UK