* Common Ancestors

Questions regarding use of any Version of Family Historian. Please ensure you have set your Version of Family Historian in your Profile. If your question fits in one of these subject-specific sub-forums, please ask it there.
Post Reply
avatar
David_Lewis
Famous
Posts: 116
Joined: 01 May 2005 18:29
Family Historian: V5

Common Ancestors

Post by David_Lewis » 07 Feb 2017 12:20

You may recall that I have been using Family Historian to record genealogical data on the Royal Family as well as my own. ( haven't found a common ancestor yet.
I can see that Prince George is a descendant multiple times over to Charlemagne but I wondered how many routes there are.
I can see this Pictorially on a diagram by choosing Diagram /Options / General/Generations up/ all, Then Check for duplicates ,options/ and unticking the Hide Duplicate Family Branches box.
Now that gives me a Pictorial View and there seem to be several hundred. I could count these manually but its slow.

If I view/ Standard Queries/Ancestors I get a list of all ancestors by generation but each person is listed only once.

is there any way of amending this query so that it doesn't omit someone if they appear more than once in the table.
The Idea I have is to export such a table into excel and then use Pivot tables to see how many times someone is related to Prince George.

Any Ideas?
Many Thanks

avatar
David_Lewis
Famous
Posts: 116
Joined: 01 May 2005 18:29
Family Historian: V5

Re: Common Ancestors

Post by David_Lewis » 07 Feb 2017 12:37

Should have remembered to say I'm still using Version 5 of Family Historian

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27088
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Common Ancestors

Post by tatewise » 07 Feb 2017 13:06

David, you don't need to tell us your FH Version as it is in your Profile on the right.

It is not easy with a Query to get that information because it only tests IsAncestorOf and not the relationship path.
You might be able to use the =Relationship() or =RelationCode() functions that allow 1st, 2nd, 3rd, et seq, closest relationship to be tested, but you would need to enter them 100s of times to cater for all possibilities.
[EDIT: I have had a quick play with this and don't think it is feasible.)

You may get what you want for one pair at a time with the Tools > How Related feature, but cannot be sure about FH V5.
Select the two Individual records for Charlemagne and Prince George then use the tool to produce a Report.
You may need to adjust the Options to exclude say Pictures and Sources.
Repeat for each pair of Individuals of interest.

The only other way I can think of is by writing a Plugin to automatically use the =Relationship() or =RelationCode() functions with each of the 1st to say 500th closest relationship.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

avatar
David_Lewis
Famous
Posts: 116
Joined: 01 May 2005 18:29
Family Historian: V5

Re: Common Ancestors

Post by David_Lewis » 07 Feb 2017 16:14

Thanks for the quick reply Mike,
I thought it might be easier than that but never mind. Would have been interesting.
Also noticed that there seems to be a limit on the maximum Ahnentafel Number. Eg Robert II of Normandy( William the conqueror's father) has a number 1,074,044,980. and Margaret of Wessex 1,705,536,519. Both are 28 times great grandparents
Given that a father's ahnentafel number is always twice his sons I reckon Charlemagne , 10 generations earlier should be around 1 Trillion!
just curious what the limit is? Guesing its 2 to the power 30.

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27088
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Common Ancestors

Post by tatewise » 07 Feb 2017 20:33

Since FH is a 32-bit program its integers are limited to 2 to the power 32.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

avatar
Gowermick
Megastar
Posts: 1632
Joined: 13 Oct 2015 07:22
Family Historian: V7
Location: Swansea

Re: Common Ancestors

Post by Gowermick » 08 Feb 2017 06:36

Mike,
Eh! Sorry to contradict you, but although you are correct in saying FH integers are currently restricted to 32 bit Integers, it is an over simplification to say it is because it is a 32bit program! The limit is down to the program writer or programming language he chose to use! (e.g. MS Excel coped when it was only a 16 bit program)

NB I have already reported this Ahnentafel limitation bug to Calico pie.
Mike Loney

Website http://www.loney.tribalpages.com
http://www.mickloney.tribalpages.com

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27088
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Common Ancestors

Post by tatewise » 08 Feb 2017 09:45

Contradiction accepted. I perhaps oversimplified my reply.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

Post Reply