I have set up the Records window to show the spouse name, but in some cases the individual has been married more than once and it is always the first spouse name that appears, not necessarily the one I am interested in. I know I can re-order the spouse details so the correct name appears, but then the data is out of sequence - is there another way to identify the 'main' marriage?
Irene B
ID:3651
* Spouse name
-
ireneblackburn
- Superstar
- Posts: 289
- Joined: 07 Apr 2005 13:40
- Family Historian: V6
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
-
HilaryBroadbent
- Gold
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 08 Mar 2005 23:26
- Family Historian: V7
Spouse name
I had a similar problem especially when the first child was illegitimate, so there was no spouse known.
I added another column to the records window to show the surname of the 2nd spouse. You could go on and add 3rd, 4th ....
I added another column to the records window to show the surname of the 2nd spouse. You could go on and add 3rd, 4th ....
Spouse name
I had thought about the idea of having a woman's married surname as a column - but had never got round to doing it. The two posts, however, got me thinking and I've just tried it.
The process I used is -
1. right click on the Column Header (of the Records Window) and select 'Configure Columns ...',
2. Select the 'surname' entry from the left window and use the right arrow to move it to the right window,
3. Select the 'surname' entry from the right window and click the 'Edit' button below the right window,
4. Change the Heading to one of your choice (such as Last Surname),
5. change the expression to 'INDI.FAMS>HUSB>NAME[last]:SURNAME' {without the inverted commas},
6. Click OK.
You should now have a column which shows the last surname of women who have been married. I have yet to confirm if it also shows the surname of the last partner of a woman where they were an 'Unmarried Couple'.
This procedure works in FH3.1.2 and the demo version of FH4 (on another PC).[smile]
Good Luck with your research . . .
Graham
The process I used is -
1. right click on the Column Header (of the Records Window) and select 'Configure Columns ...',
2. Select the 'surname' entry from the left window and use the right arrow to move it to the right window,
3. Select the 'surname' entry from the right window and click the 'Edit' button below the right window,
4. Change the Heading to one of your choice (such as Last Surname),
5. change the expression to 'INDI.FAMS>HUSB>NAME[last]:SURNAME' {without the inverted commas},
6. Click OK.
You should now have a column which shows the last surname of women who have been married. I have yet to confirm if it also shows the surname of the last partner of a woman where they were an 'Unmarried Couple'.
This procedure works in FH3.1.2 and the demo version of FH4 (on another PC).[smile]
Good Luck with your research . . .
Graham
Spouse name
Hello again,
I've done a little more checking on this subject and got myself confused [oops].
My previous post was wrong [oops] in that the word 'last' in square brackets should be placed after the FAMS - ie INDI.FAMS[last]>HUSB>NAME[1]:SURNAME.
However, I also found another slight 'problem' which comes from INDI.FAMS[last]>HUSB>NAME[last]:SURNAME. This will give the same result as the previous line UNLESS the husband had an alternative name (as one of my ancestors had).
I hope this makes sense and helps resolve the column issues . . .
Graham [wink]
I've done a little more checking on this subject and got myself confused [oops].
My previous post was wrong [oops] in that the word 'last' in square brackets should be placed after the FAMS - ie INDI.FAMS[last]>HUSB>NAME[1]:SURNAME.
However, I also found another slight 'problem' which comes from INDI.FAMS[last]>HUSB>NAME[last]:SURNAME. This will give the same result as the previous line UNLESS the husband had an alternative name (as one of my ancestors had).
I hope this makes sense and helps resolve the column issues . . .
Graham [wink]
Spouse name
I do something similar where I have a 'Spouse' column with the following code:
[pre]INDI.~SPOU[last]>NAME[1]:PREFERRED[/pre]
This gives the last spouse for everyone not just wives.
Mind you, if you do that then other Marriage-related columns also need changing. I have a 'Marr. Date' column with:
[pre]INDI.FAMS[last]>MARR.DATE:ABBREV2[/pre]
and a 'Marriage Place' column:
[pre]INDI.FAMS[last]>MARR.PLAC[/pre]
I'm sure there's problems with these, but it does show the last marriage relationship which is usually the one I'm related to.
What would be nicer is to be able to say
[pre]INDI.~SPOU[who is my ancestor]>NAME[1][/pre][grin]
Mark
[pre]INDI.~SPOU[last]>NAME[1]:PREFERRED[/pre]
This gives the last spouse for everyone not just wives.
Mind you, if you do that then other Marriage-related columns also need changing. I have a 'Marr. Date' column with:
[pre]INDI.FAMS[last]>MARR.DATE:ABBREV2[/pre]
and a 'Marriage Place' column:
[pre]INDI.FAMS[last]>MARR.PLAC[/pre]
I'm sure there's problems with these, but it does show the last marriage relationship which is usually the one I'm related to.
What would be nicer is to be able to say
[pre]INDI.~SPOU[who is my ancestor]>NAME[1][/pre][grin]
Mark
-
ireneblackburn
- Superstar
- Posts: 289
- Joined: 07 Apr 2005 13:40
- Family Historian: V6
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Spouse name
Do you think
INDI.~SPOU[who is my ancestor]>NAME[1]
would make it on to the wishlist - wouldn't it be convenient.
Irene B
INDI.~SPOU[who is my ancestor]>NAME[1]
would make it on to the wishlist - wouldn't it be convenient.
Irene B
-
Jane
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8441
- Joined: 01 Nov 2002 15:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Somerset, England
- Contact:
Spouse name
I think you might be able to do it now with the new functions in V4, but it would take a bit of playing with.
Spouse name
I see there is a IsAncestorOf function. I've not looked that closely. Can you put functions in these statements?
I'll have a play but to be honest I don't find the syntax easy.
Mark
I'll have a play but to be honest I don't find the syntax easy.
Mark