* Second marriage

Got general Family History research questions - this is the place
Post Reply
avatar
Stevebye
Superstar
Posts: 258
Joined: 04 Mar 2006 23:41
Family Historian: V6

Second marriage

Post by Stevebye » 27 Jun 2011 11:19

A close family member has asked me not to include her second marriage in my tree, it wasn't a good marriage. I've told her that I know of two other trees that includes it and have sent emails requesting them to remove him. Both have said no but they will remove his name and date of marriage.

So do I do the same or not enter it at all ?

ID:5163

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27085
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Second marriage

Post by tatewise » 27 Jun 2011 13:12

You could do something similar and add Private details in the Note in [ [double square brackets] ] so they can easily be excluded in Reports, etc.

As long as the details are private on your PC does it really matter - the marriage did actually happen.
Furthermore, the details are in the public domain. Anyone can look them up online, and if really interested buy the Marriage Certificate from the GRO!
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

avatar
margarita
Famous
Posts: 110
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 20:11
Family Historian: V6.2
Location: Crete, Greece

Second marriage

Post by margarita » 27 Jun 2011 13:25

Sitting on the fence a bit here..............

maybe it depends on what you are proposing to do with your tree.

If the tree is not available publicly, then I would include the details - the marriage was a fact and, however much your family member might want to, she can't change that.

If the tree is to be publicly available then perhaps you should include a second marriage for her but not include details.

There must be a lot of people who have information included in family trees that they wish wasn’t, but if you include straightforward facts I can’t see that you have done anything wrong.

Maybe it also depends if this person is close only in a family history sense (i.e. closely related) or close in a personal sense (i.e. you are friends as well as family).

I don’t suppose this is any help at all, but may give you something to ponder.

Regards,

Maggie

Post Reply