Page 1 of 1

web site - inclusion of photos of the 'living'

Posted: 27 Sep 2009 17:20
by billor
Just noticed that the web pages I have generated using v4.0.2 (http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.anc ... lloreilly/) do not include photos of the individuals flagged as 'living' even though the tick box on the Privacy settings page (see image) is unticked.
Anyone know if this is a 'feature' or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
Bill
Image

ID:4027

web site - inclusion of photos of the 'living'

Posted: 27 Sep 2009 17:23
by billor
Note the image is wrong! FH reset the options when I went to take the screen shot but it WAS unticked when I generated the web pages - honest!!
I have tried a couple of times with different combinations of options but the only way I can get the photos included is to de-select the show basic details only tick box - and I do not want to show the dates etc but I do want to include the individual photos, wedding photos etc.
Thanks,
Bill

web site - inclusion of photos of the 'living'

Posted: 20 Oct 2009 10:45
by ergometer
I am having exactly the same problem. This looks like a bug to me.

I can't find anywhere on the family historian web page to submit a support request other than emailing them.

web site - inclusion of photos of the 'living'

Posted: 20 Oct 2009 15:23
by Jane
If you want to submit a possible bug just email support at family-historian.co.uk

web site - inclusion of photos of the 'living'

Posted: 21 Oct 2009 11:25
by SimonOrde
If you tick 'Show basic details only' pictures for the flagged individuals are not usually shown.  Click on the Help button on this page for a full explanation of the policy on pictures.  The on-screen description is just a shortened version - for the complete explanation, please see the Help.

If you want to be able to view pictures for 'Basic Details only' people, please  propose this on the FHUG Wish List.

web site - inclusion of photos of the 'living'

Posted: 21 Oct 2009 17:13
by ergometer
Thanks for the response. I had to read the help twice - but I think I understand it now. I will propose that the option be added.

Eric