A problem with an individual's names...
Posted: 14 Jan 2006 17:11
Hi All
Hoping somebody can help me with this...
At the time John Henry was born his mother (Ruth Edith Wood)was unmarried. He was registered as John Henry Spreadbury Wood, clearly indicating that John Spreadbury was the father although no father was given on the birth certificate.
His mother married John Spreadbury seven months after the birth, on the twelfth of August 1920, thereby legitemising the Spreadbury name and the Wood was then, conveniently, dropped...
Should he appear in the family history as a Wood or a Spreadbury?
Logic says that he should be in as Wood, as that is the name on his birth certificate... This is how I have him at the moment with 'John Henry Spreadbury' in the 'Name Used' field of the Detail tab...
The problem is going to come when I need to add some subsequent events to him - He was using Spreadbury for everything but will appear as Wood (if anyone's still following this) - i.e. A subsequent marriage certificate will be for John Henry Spreadbury and Bertha Tanka (or whatever) but will have to be attached to John Henry Wood and any offspring would show as Wood - thereby making the tree a nonsense...
I could put him in as a Spreadbury, which overcomes the issues of his events after his parent's marriage, with John Henry Wood in the 'Name Used' field of the Detail tab but, of course, that wasn't the name he used...
This problem must also occur with name changes following adoption or deed polls...
Anybody got any ideas or suggestions???
ID:1289
Hoping somebody can help me with this...
At the time John Henry was born his mother (Ruth Edith Wood)was unmarried. He was registered as John Henry Spreadbury Wood, clearly indicating that John Spreadbury was the father although no father was given on the birth certificate.
His mother married John Spreadbury seven months after the birth, on the twelfth of August 1920, thereby legitemising the Spreadbury name and the Wood was then, conveniently, dropped...
Should he appear in the family history as a Wood or a Spreadbury?
Logic says that he should be in as Wood, as that is the name on his birth certificate... This is how I have him at the moment with 'John Henry Spreadbury' in the 'Name Used' field of the Detail tab...
The problem is going to come when I need to add some subsequent events to him - He was using Spreadbury for everything but will appear as Wood (if anyone's still following this) - i.e. A subsequent marriage certificate will be for John Henry Spreadbury and Bertha Tanka (or whatever) but will have to be attached to John Henry Wood and any offspring would show as Wood - thereby making the tree a nonsense...
I could put him in as a Spreadbury, which overcomes the issues of his events after his parent's marriage, with John Henry Wood in the 'Name Used' field of the Detail tab but, of course, that wasn't the name he used...
This problem must also occur with name changes following adoption or deed polls...
Anybody got any ideas or suggestions???
ID:1289