This is more a general query than specific to FH (which I am really enjoying using). How do other people manage the name records for married women? I always list their single name where I have it and use 'Unknown' where I do not (as yet) know their maiden names. This means that, after adding data for several family names, I have a huge number of Unknowns listed. When I then search census and death records it is difficult to cross-check that information quickly with my records. Especially as so many of the women seem to be Mary Anns and Sarahs! Any hints gratefully received.
ID:67
* LACK OF MAIDEN NAMES
- Jane
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8442
- Joined: 01 Nov 2002 15:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Somerset, England
- Contact:
LACK OF MAIDEN NAMES
I put no surname in, using // to show FH there is no surname.
So for example
Rosemary Jane //
I can then use queries to find people with a Null surname.
PS I used to use the Unknown method in my previous software, but FH allows me to have a blank surname so much the better.
PPS you can also use / to identify double barreled surnames
eg
Jane /Smith Barton/
So for example
Rosemary Jane //
I can then use queries to find people with a Null surname.
PS I used to use the Unknown method in my previous software, but FH allows me to have a blank surname so much the better.
PPS you can also use / to identify double barreled surnames
eg
Jane /Smith Barton/
LACK OF MAIDEN NAMES
I put the married surname in brackets when I do not know the maiden name, eg Jennifer /(HOLLAND)/
- dspivey
- Platinum
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 09 Jun 2003 23:01
- Family Historian: V6.2
- Location: London
- Contact:
LACK OF MAIDEN NAMES
Thanks, both of you. I'll experiment a bit with this.
Diane
Diane