Page 1 of 1
Source images per row in web page
Posted: 01 Apr 2006 18:02
by NickWalker
Family Historian always seems to show 8 source images per row in websites it creates. This is fine until you decide to change the width of the images to make, for example, census or certificate images readable. If I set an image to 20cm wide the web page still shows 8 images per row so is over a metre and a half wide! This makes using sources images difficult on web sites or CDs.
Nick
ID:1491
Source images per row in web page
Posted: 21 May 2006 18:30
by bgriffiths
Add 'me too' to this. Ideally would like to specify number of pictures per row
Brian
Source images per row in web page
Posted: 05 Mar 2007 07:06
by jeemo
Nick and Brian
How do you get 8 images? My web pages are always only 4 images per row. For me 6 would be great.
e.g. see
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com ... /ind9.html
John
Source images per row in web page
Posted: 05 Mar 2007 11:16
by NickWalker
I think this might have changed with version 3.1. The version history says:
Source pictures used to have to be displayed to the right of source listings in Reports, and above them in rows in web pages, family tree CDs, or word-processor documents. You now have 4 options:
To the Right of the Text
Above All Citations
Below All Citations
Below Each Citation
You can now set both a maximum width, and you have the option to enlarge small pictures to this size. You can also set a maximum height.
All options are supported not just for reports, but also for web pages (HTML format) and word-processor documents (Rich Text Format) - except to the Right of the Text which is treated as Above All Citations in HTML and RTF format. All options only ever stack pictures one above the other - you no longer get multiple pictures per line.
Options can be chosen from the Sources tab of the Report Options dialog.
I'm at work so I don't have Family Historian available to check this out.
Source images per row in web page
Posted: 06 Mar 2007 01:43
by jeemo
Nick
I missed the word 'Source' in your original post. I was commenting on the actual data section of the web pages not the sources. However, the information you have posted is very useful for the time when I may be creating images to match my sources.
John