* Backup & Restore - Tate or Draper?

For users to report plugin bugs and request plugin enhancements; and for authors to test new/new versions of plugins, and to discuss plugin development (in the Programming Technicalities sub-forum). If you want advice on choosing or using a plugin, please ask in General Usage or an appropriate sub-forum.
Post Reply
avatar
Mardon
Gold
Posts: 23
Joined: 19 Jun 2022 15:12
Family Historian: V7
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

Backup & Restore - Tate or Draper?

Post by Mardon »

I bought FH7 today after finishing a 30 day trial. I'm switching from RM8. I want to have a solid backup strategy for my FH7 projects. My plan is to keep time-staggered, full backups, on two removable thumb drives. I believe the other thing that I need is a backup of my FH7 settings. I plan to also save these on the same thumb drives. My question is which Backup & Restore plugin should I use? The Plugin Store has one developed by Mike Tate and another developed by Mark Draper. Which should I use? What are the pros and cons of each? TIA
User avatar
ColeValleyGirl
Megastar
Posts: 5464
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 22:02
Family Historian: V7
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire
Contact:

Re: Backup & Restore - Tate or Draper?

Post by ColeValleyGirl »

I'm sure both authors will be along but there's some info here:

Backup and Restore FH Settings via Windows - new plugin (20544)

I used to use the Mike Tate plugin, but as a confident Windows user, I'm finding the new Mark Draper otion simpler and more convenient.
User avatar
BillH
Megastar
Posts: 2245
Joined: 31 May 2010 03:40
Family Historian: V7
Location: Washington State, USA

Re: Backup & Restore - Tate or Draper?

Post by BillH »

Both plugins work well. I have used the Mike Tate plugin for years. I find it very easy to use and don't see any need to change to the Mark Draper plugin. I have used both and I think the Mike Tate plugin is a little slower, but not enough to cause me any problems.

Bill
User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2458
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Backup & Restore - Tate or Draper?

Post by Mark1834 »

This summary in the Knowledge Base gives an overview of backup strategies and the pros and cons of the two different plugins.

The key difference is probably that mine is easier to use for newcomers to FH while giving power users additional options, while Mike's is very familiar to established users so if it works for you there is no reason to change.

Try both, and see which user interface you are more comfortable with.
Mark Draper
User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 28333
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Backup & Restore - Tate or Draper?

Post by tatewise »

The differences between the two plugins are largely historic. My plugin was originally written years ago for FH V5 and updated for each new version. It had to cope with features of FH V5 and FH V6 that have been improved in FH V7 such as Diagram Icon files must now be inside the FH ProgramData settings Icons folder where previously they could be anywhere on disk. So Mark's plugin and power user variants don't have to analyze Diagram files in search of Icon files and that makes the process much simpler.

However, there are features of my old plugin that are not offered in the new plugin.
1) Component settings can be backed up or restored selectively depending on the modified date of the master file and the backup file. i.e. Old versions can overwrite newer versions or not as required.
2) Image files inserted into Diagrams are included in the backup. Such files can be anywhere on disk and require Diagram files to be analyzed. However, users can mitigate that by ensuring those files are within either the FH ProgramData folder or the Project folder and then the new plugin will automatically include them.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
Post Reply