What is a Source Note, and a Descriptor
Posted: 29 Sep 2022 10:09
This isn't an important issue. I'm just trying to understand what's going on.
So, I've looked in the FH help, the forum and the knowledgebase but I can't find a reference to a Source Note. It's quite possible I missed finding it - wouldn't be the first time I couldn't find something that was in plain sight. Descriptor is mentioned in passing in a post from Mike Tate where he indicates that FH7 doesn't do much with Descriptors. (Mike, apologies if I've verballed you).
The story...
Moving from from Relatively Yours 3 (RY3) to FH7 I have two main GEDCOM export "formats" I can use - PAF and a format called RY3 which is designed to be imported into another RY3 system. The GEDCOMs produced are a little different. In my initial tests I tried both formats and the PAF GEDCOM resulted in a better import into FH7 because the import created source citations. The RY3 GEDCOM didn't create source citations. Further research shows that whilst the RY3 GEDCOM does not create source citations, it does create Source Notes, and also a Descriptor which contains data that is missing from the PAF GEDCOM.
The GEDCOM format is 5.5 and is the only export option I have in RY3, and I think, from reading the GEDCOM specs, that 5.5 is the source of the issues (pun not intended).
Here are the details on a Burial imported from the PAF GEDCOM: Here are the details on a Burial imported from the RY3 GEDCOM: Notice that the PAF import shows a Burial Event but nothing about it being a cremation, but the RY3 import has an added Descriptor value which shows this Burial as a Cremation. In addition, the RY3 import has a Source Note instead of a Source.
This is the PAF GEDCOM:
1 BURI
2 DATE 8 DEC 1973
2 PLAC Orange Cemetery, Orange, New South Wales, Australia
2 RIN 2111
2 NOTE Ashes placed in Niche Wall MM Location # 103
3 CONT Funeral Director: F Smith, Orange
3 CONT
3 CONT Plaque says:
3 CONT
3 CONT In Loving Memory of
3 CONT Victor Herbert Newton
3 CONT Passed Away 6th Dec 1973
3 CONT Aged 55 years
2 SOUR @S6@
3 PAGE Orange Cemetery Transcriptions
3 QUAY 3
This is the RY3 GEDCOM:
1 BURI
2 TYPE D07 Death, Cremation
2 DATE 8 DEC 1973
2 PLAC Orange Cemetery, Orange, New South Wales, Australia
2 RIN 2111
2 NOTE Ashes placed in Niche Wall MM Location # 103
3 CONT Funeral Director: F Smith, Orange
3 CONT
3 CONT Plaque says:
3 CONT
3 CONT In Loving Memory of
3 CONT Victor Herbert Newton
3 CONT Passed Away 6th Dec 1973
3 CONT Aged 55 years
2 SOUR
3 TYPE C00 Cemetery Transcripts, Not Otherwise Specified
3 PAGE Orange Cemetery Transcriptions
3 QUAY 3
It's the TYPE tag that becomes the Descriptor in FH7.
And the PAF GEDCOM has the SOURce reference as @S6@, which is:
0 @S6@ SOUR
1 TITL C0
in the GEDCOM, whereas it is just SOUR in the RY3 GEDCOM. I'm assuming this is where the issues lie as the RY3 GEDCOM doesn't have any @Sx@ tags at all. (Oh, the TITL is just C0 in this example, but other sources do have a proper TITL tag).
I'm not worried about the differences and missing data as I plan on redoing all of my citations anyway, but as I said at the start of this post, I just want to understand what's going on.
Thanks, Glenn
So, I've looked in the FH help, the forum and the knowledgebase but I can't find a reference to a Source Note. It's quite possible I missed finding it - wouldn't be the first time I couldn't find something that was in plain sight. Descriptor is mentioned in passing in a post from Mike Tate where he indicates that FH7 doesn't do much with Descriptors. (Mike, apologies if I've verballed you).
The story...
Moving from from Relatively Yours 3 (RY3) to FH7 I have two main GEDCOM export "formats" I can use - PAF and a format called RY3 which is designed to be imported into another RY3 system. The GEDCOMs produced are a little different. In my initial tests I tried both formats and the PAF GEDCOM resulted in a better import into FH7 because the import created source citations. The RY3 GEDCOM didn't create source citations. Further research shows that whilst the RY3 GEDCOM does not create source citations, it does create Source Notes, and also a Descriptor which contains data that is missing from the PAF GEDCOM.
The GEDCOM format is 5.5 and is the only export option I have in RY3, and I think, from reading the GEDCOM specs, that 5.5 is the source of the issues (pun not intended).
Here are the details on a Burial imported from the PAF GEDCOM: Here are the details on a Burial imported from the RY3 GEDCOM: Notice that the PAF import shows a Burial Event but nothing about it being a cremation, but the RY3 import has an added Descriptor value which shows this Burial as a Cremation. In addition, the RY3 import has a Source Note instead of a Source.
This is the PAF GEDCOM:
1 BURI
2 DATE 8 DEC 1973
2 PLAC Orange Cemetery, Orange, New South Wales, Australia
2 RIN 2111
2 NOTE Ashes placed in Niche Wall MM Location # 103
3 CONT Funeral Director: F Smith, Orange
3 CONT
3 CONT Plaque says:
3 CONT
3 CONT In Loving Memory of
3 CONT Victor Herbert Newton
3 CONT Passed Away 6th Dec 1973
3 CONT Aged 55 years
2 SOUR @S6@
3 PAGE Orange Cemetery Transcriptions
3 QUAY 3
This is the RY3 GEDCOM:
1 BURI
2 TYPE D07 Death, Cremation
2 DATE 8 DEC 1973
2 PLAC Orange Cemetery, Orange, New South Wales, Australia
2 RIN 2111
2 NOTE Ashes placed in Niche Wall MM Location # 103
3 CONT Funeral Director: F Smith, Orange
3 CONT
3 CONT Plaque says:
3 CONT
3 CONT In Loving Memory of
3 CONT Victor Herbert Newton
3 CONT Passed Away 6th Dec 1973
3 CONT Aged 55 years
2 SOUR
3 TYPE C00 Cemetery Transcripts, Not Otherwise Specified
3 PAGE Orange Cemetery Transcriptions
3 QUAY 3
It's the TYPE tag that becomes the Descriptor in FH7.
And the PAF GEDCOM has the SOURce reference as @S6@, which is:
0 @S6@ SOUR
1 TITL C0
in the GEDCOM, whereas it is just SOUR in the RY3 GEDCOM. I'm assuming this is where the issues lie as the RY3 GEDCOM doesn't have any @Sx@ tags at all. (Oh, the TITL is just C0 in this example, but other sources do have a proper TITL tag).
I'm not worried about the differences and missing data as I plan on redoing all of my citations anyway, but as I said at the start of this post, I just want to understand what's going on.
Thanks, Glenn