Import from TMG - Source and Citations
Posted: 26 Dec 2020 19:25
I figured I have received so much competent help, that I'll brave a few more questions: I have spent about a week now auditing imported data from my TMG database into FH7 and I have noticed a few more discrepancies. The first one is regard to the sources imported. I noticed in a post from 2014 regarding import from TMG that the list of sources from "Records Window->Sources" must match the list from FH Query "Source Records - All". My records window sorted by record ID shows the last ID as being 1435, while the Source Records - All list shows 1431 records. My Master Source list from TMG shows 1431 records. Should I be concerned about this? And if I should examine this further, what can I do to discover the reason for the discrepancy?
The next question is in regards to citations. My TMG Project summary shows 64,690 while FH7 shows only 51,679 (13,011 less than TMG). After some searching on this forum and knowledge base it seems that most (there are 5,656 individuals in my TMG dataset) of these are citations related to the parent-child relationship. I don't fault FH7 for this as I realize that the GEDCOM standard has no good way to provide citations for this data (which is baffling to me considering one of the central provenance endeavors in genealogy is documenting relationships, but I digress). I see that FH allowed citations to witnesses and so provides a way to add the parents as witnesses to a child's birth and sourcing these. Is this what people do? Also, regarding the ~13K missing citations, I came across two LUA scripts designed to import into FH exported citations data from TMG. Do these scripts still work in FH7?
This is the forum post in questions (the last entry contain links to the scripts): Import from TMG - Missing Some Citations (11462)
Thank you all once again for your help, I realize exporting data from TMG is a complex and difficult issue, and so I am happy to see that FH7's import is as complete as it is.
The next question is in regards to citations. My TMG Project summary shows 64,690 while FH7 shows only 51,679 (13,011 less than TMG). After some searching on this forum and knowledge base it seems that most (there are 5,656 individuals in my TMG dataset) of these are citations related to the parent-child relationship. I don't fault FH7 for this as I realize that the GEDCOM standard has no good way to provide citations for this data (which is baffling to me considering one of the central provenance endeavors in genealogy is documenting relationships, but I digress). I see that FH allowed citations to witnesses and so provides a way to add the parents as witnesses to a child's birth and sourcing these. Is this what people do? Also, regarding the ~13K missing citations, I came across two LUA scripts designed to import into FH exported citations data from TMG. Do these scripts still work in FH7?
This is the forum post in questions (the last entry contain links to the scripts): Import from TMG - Missing Some Citations (11462)
Thank you all once again for your help, I realize exporting data from TMG is a complex and difficult issue, and so I am happy to see that FH7's import is as complete as it is.