puzzling 1871 Census record
Posted: 01 Aug 2009 16:38
I'm hoping those of you more familiar with English census records can shed some light on this household entry from the 1871 Census.
The page in question is:
RG10; Piece: 2133; Folio: 57; Page: 40
At 31 Queen Street, Stoke Damerel, Devon, there seem to be two families.
The first is:
Family 253
Mary A Turpin age 33 Mother
George W Turpin age 12 Son
William H Turpin age 10 Son
Frederick R Turpin age 5 Son
Thomas Turpin age 1 Son
(all born Devonport)
Seems straightforward enough. But next I find:
Family 254
Mary Hore (age 49) Wife Married born Allington, Devon, England
Charles E Elliott (age 16) Son born Devonport, Devon, England
Grace Hore (age 13) Daughter-in-law born Essenford, Cornwall, England
This makes no sense to me, that a 13-year-old unmarried child with the same name as the adult should be listed as 'daughter-in-law'.
Presumably Mary is Charles Elliott's mother, she has remarried, and her husband is named Hore [Hoare?] and he is Grace's father, and Grace is Mary's step-daughter. But where is Mary's husband?
I find it odd that Mary is listed as 'Wife' not 'Head'. Might that be a clue that her husband simply got skipped when the enumerator was filling out the form?
I know that in the US, the original sheets as filled out by the enumerator were copied and the copies were filed at the National level. When I see families like this, I can sometimes find missing family members listed on addendum pages at the end of the records for the census district.
I'm guessing that since the Turpins were all born in Devonport, as was Charles Elliott, there might be a connection between the families there.
My next step will be to look in FreeBMD for possible marriages, and census records from 1861/1881, but if anyone can suggest other means of finding information about these families, I'd be grateful.
(I confess I am thoroughly spoiled now by having access to the newspaper published in one of the towns I'm studying in the US. I've been able to construct a large branch on one of my husband's lines from the marriage announcements, obituaries, and news items just from the newspaper. It's a pity we don't have access to that kind of resource for all our families.)
Jan
ID:3904
The page in question is:
RG10; Piece: 2133; Folio: 57; Page: 40
At 31 Queen Street, Stoke Damerel, Devon, there seem to be two families.
The first is:
Family 253
Mary A Turpin age 33 Mother
George W Turpin age 12 Son
William H Turpin age 10 Son
Frederick R Turpin age 5 Son
Thomas Turpin age 1 Son
(all born Devonport)
Seems straightforward enough. But next I find:
Family 254
Mary Hore (age 49) Wife Married born Allington, Devon, England
Charles E Elliott (age 16) Son born Devonport, Devon, England
Grace Hore (age 13) Daughter-in-law born Essenford, Cornwall, England
This makes no sense to me, that a 13-year-old unmarried child with the same name as the adult should be listed as 'daughter-in-law'.
Presumably Mary is Charles Elliott's mother, she has remarried, and her husband is named Hore [Hoare?] and he is Grace's father, and Grace is Mary's step-daughter. But where is Mary's husband?
I find it odd that Mary is listed as 'Wife' not 'Head'. Might that be a clue that her husband simply got skipped when the enumerator was filling out the form?
I know that in the US, the original sheets as filled out by the enumerator were copied and the copies were filed at the National level. When I see families like this, I can sometimes find missing family members listed on addendum pages at the end of the records for the census district.
I'm guessing that since the Turpins were all born in Devonport, as was Charles Elliott, there might be a connection between the families there.
My next step will be to look in FreeBMD for possible marriages, and census records from 1861/1881, but if anyone can suggest other means of finding information about these families, I'd be grateful.
(I confess I am thoroughly spoiled now by having access to the newspaper published in one of the towns I'm studying in the US. I've been able to construct a large branch on one of my husband's lines from the marriage announcements, obituaries, and news items just from the newspaper. It's a pity we don't have access to that kind of resource for all our families.)
Jan
ID:3904