Old handwriting
Posted: 24 Nov 2021 01:40
Apologies if this too off-topic, please move the post as necessary.
I think I may have found the marriage for one of my ancestors buried on a half-unindexed page on Ancestry, but I am having trouble deciphering the handwriting and would appreicate any input on how you read it. My ancestor was Matthew Collier (Collyer, Colear, inter alia) and his wife was called, I thought, Grace. Although, if this the marriage entry then perhaps not. The marriage entry is from 5 January 1692/93 in Cirencester (Glos.):
How do you read that? If yu have an ancestry subscription and want to see the whole page to get a better feel for the handwriting, this is from Gloucestershire, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1813, Cirencester Parish 1637-1799, image 273 of 562. The entry is just past 2/3 of the way down the right hand column.
For comparison, Their eldest son was called Samuel, and he was baptised in Cirencester on 28 June 1694, i.e. 18 months later:
Matthew was baptised in 1674, so his wedding was unlikely to have been very long before the birth of Samuel in 1694 and the family were all living in Cirencester for a couple of generations before and after, so it was unlikely to have been anywhere else. It's proving pretty elusive though - this is perhaps the closest I've come so far.
I think I may have found the marriage for one of my ancestors buried on a half-unindexed page on Ancestry, but I am having trouble deciphering the handwriting and would appreicate any input on how you read it. My ancestor was Matthew Collier (Collyer, Colear, inter alia) and his wife was called, I thought, Grace. Although, if this the marriage entry then perhaps not. The marriage entry is from 5 January 1692/93 in Cirencester (Glos.):
How do you read that? If yu have an ancestry subscription and want to see the whole page to get a better feel for the handwriting, this is from Gloucestershire, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1813, Cirencester Parish 1637-1799, image 273 of 562. The entry is just past 2/3 of the way down the right hand column.
For comparison, Their eldest son was called Samuel, and he was baptised in Cirencester on 28 June 1694, i.e. 18 months later:
Matthew was baptised in 1674, so his wedding was unlikely to have been very long before the birth of Samuel in 1694 and the family were all living in Cirencester for a couple of generations before and after, so it was unlikely to have been anywhere else. It's proving pretty elusive though - this is perhaps the closest I've come so far.