Certificate of registry of birth
Posted: 20 Apr 2016 13:15
I'd only ever seen the normal copy of the full Birth register entry before, until I came across this, a Certificate of Registry of Birth for an uncle born in 1912. I'd thought Short Form Birth Certificates only started in 1953 but this appears to be a fore-runner of short form certificates.
Searching online I could find hardly any reference to them, other than the occasional comment that they might have been issued if the person had been adopted, or that they were used because they were cheaper than the full birth certificate. Did our 19th/early20th century forebears usually pay for a full certificate or were these much commoner but just not seen so much now because we so often research using GRO copies rather than the original documents our ancestors had?
I'm particularly interested because (according to family lore) this uncle was adopted. I've been unable to find any trace of him in the Birth index and GRO said they couldn't find any register entry for him. I'm confident that the DoB on the Certificate is accurate as I can find him in the 1939 Register on FMP and it has the same DoB. I have applied to Islington to see if they have anything although they say their pre-1945 registers were mostly destroyed during WW2 so I'm not expecting much back.
I know that pre-1927 adoptions are usually impossible to trace back to natural birth parents, and I have no other information about the circumstances of his adoption.
Might the Certificate of Registry of Birth have been used if someone was adopted? What might have been the reason - would the original birth entry be amended and the the Certificate issued in the adopted name? That seems unlikely here though as the Certificate was issued 11 days after the date of birth.
Any suggestions of when/how these Certificates were used would be appreciated.
Searching online I could find hardly any reference to them, other than the occasional comment that they might have been issued if the person had been adopted, or that they were used because they were cheaper than the full birth certificate. Did our 19th/early20th century forebears usually pay for a full certificate or were these much commoner but just not seen so much now because we so often research using GRO copies rather than the original documents our ancestors had?
I'm particularly interested because (according to family lore) this uncle was adopted. I've been unable to find any trace of him in the Birth index and GRO said they couldn't find any register entry for him. I'm confident that the DoB on the Certificate is accurate as I can find him in the 1939 Register on FMP and it has the same DoB. I have applied to Islington to see if they have anything although they say their pre-1945 registers were mostly destroyed during WW2 so I'm not expecting much back.
I know that pre-1927 adoptions are usually impossible to trace back to natural birth parents, and I have no other information about the circumstances of his adoption.
Might the Certificate of Registry of Birth have been used if someone was adopted? What might have been the reason - would the original birth entry be amended and the the Certificate issued in the adopted name? That seems unlikely here though as the Certificate was issued 11 days after the date of birth.
Any suggestions of when/how these Certificates were used would be appreciated.