But the places of birth for the family are completely different, as shown as follows:
In 1911, the places are listed as 1) Exton Nr Chorley 2) Wakefield 3) Wakefield and 4) St Helens., Lancs, (these are consistent with 1891 census.)
BUT in 1901, they are shown as 1) Wigan, 2) Hull, 3) Batley 4) Wigan - eh?
I can only assume the enumerator must have got his notes wrong or turned over two pages, as the places of birth are truly fictitional and not even close to reality!
I was going to reject the 1901 census, until I saw they were still at same address in 1911, so moral is, don't always trust what enumerator has written. If it looks like a good match, it probably is