* Possible bug with v4.5?

AS allows faster and more convenient creation of source records for Family Historian.
Post Reply
User avatar
Valkrider
Megastar
Posts: 1534
Joined: 04 Jun 2012 19:03
Family Historian: V7
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Possible bug with v4.5?

Post by Valkrider » 28 Dec 2014 10:37

I have just been creating a death entry for one of my ancestors who was married 4 times.

In the auto text it stated her name as the first of her married surnames not as her maiden name or as her final married surname.

No big issue as it is easy to edit the auto text but surely it should take the maiden name as that auto text?

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27086
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Possible bug with v4.5?

Post by tatewise » 28 Dec 2014 12:31

On the grounds that Death Certificates (and maybe Parish Registers) record the married surname of women, I suspect AS is trying to mimic that, but is probably overlooking multiple marriages.

Nick will no doubt comment, but AS always advises that Auto Text is rarely a perfect transcript and will usually need editing anyway.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

User avatar
johnmorrisoniom
Megastar
Posts: 882
Joined: 18 Dec 2008 07:40
Family Historian: V7
Location: Isle of Man

Re: Possible bug with v4.5?

Post by johnmorrisoniom » 28 Dec 2014 18:53

If, Like I do, you use AS a lot, then the data in the file can end up out of sequence, even though it shows in the correct order in FH. It is worthwhile re-ordering out of sequence events, or you can get the symptoms you are seeing.

User avatar
NickWalker
Megastar
Posts: 2401
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 17:39
Family Historian: V7
Location: Lancashire, UK
Contact:

Re: Possible bug with v4.5?

Post by NickWalker » 28 Dec 2014 19:21

Valkrider wrote:I have just been creating a death entry for one of my ancestors who was married 4 times.

In the auto text it stated her name as the first of her married surnames not as her maiden name or as her final married surname.

No big issue as it is easy to edit the auto text but surely it should take the maiden name as that auto text?
It doesn't show the maiden name because you have the use last married name for deceased female option set. Ancestral Sources will look at all the marriages and selects the surname of the person she married in the final marriage. So you may wish to check that the order of the marriages is correct in Family Historian.

If you look in Family Historian and view the deceased woman in the properties window, does the order of the tabs for the 4 husbands reflect the true order of the marriages? Or alternatively if you view her in the focus window does it show the 4 marriages in the correct order?
Nick Walker
Ancestral Sources Developer

https://fhug.org.uk/kb/kb-article/ancestral-sources/

User avatar
Valkrider
Megastar
Posts: 1534
Joined: 04 Jun 2012 19:03
Family Historian: V7
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: Possible bug with v4.5?

Post by Valkrider » 29 Dec 2014 08:43

Nick

Thanks for that, I missed that setting. I have changed the option now.

It has taken her earliest married name that I have recorded in FH, there was one earlier marriage that I have been unable to trace documentation for, so all I know currently from the records is she was married but not to whom or when.

Post Reply