* Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Questions regarding use of any Version of Family Historian. Please ensure you have set your Version of Family Historian in your Profile. If your question fits in one of these subject-specific sub-forums, please ask it there.
Post Reply
avatar
jimstothers
Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: 04 Jul 2022 15:45
Family Historian: V7

Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by jimstothers » 23 Jul 2023 17:21

I am unclear about how to mark people as dead that I know are dead but don't know when they died. I know there is a Living Flag that can be used to mark people as living. But what about people who don't have a death event, but who are certainly dead - e.g. they were born 130 years ago? Does FH treat them as dead if there were born before a certain number of years ago? I'm thinking also about when happened when a GEDCOM file is exported to an online site - is there a generally agreed protocol whereby details of people born after a certain number of years ago won't be shown unless there is a death date (or a died before date) shown in their record?

User avatar
ADC65
Superstar
Posts: 376
Joined: 09 Jul 2007 10:27
Family Historian: V7

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by ADC65 » 23 Jul 2023 17:32

You can set some parameters in Preferences > Estimates as shown below:

Screenshot 2023-07-23 182832.png
Screenshot 2023-07-23 182832.png (31.3 KiB) Viewed 767 times

I don't think there is a 'dead' flag as such - if you want to mark people as such, you could create your own flag. Do you know how to do this? Just ask if not.

There isn't a generally agreed protocol for other sites, in my experience. Some will use 100 years, some use 110 years, and others (like TNG) will allow you to set your own parameter.
Adrian Cook
Researching Cook, Summers, Phipps and Bradford, mainly in Wales and the South West of England

User avatar
Jane
Site Admin
Posts: 8440
Joined: 01 Nov 2002 15:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Somerset, England
Contact:

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by Jane » 23 Jul 2023 17:34

You can add a "blank" Death Fact which will enough to show they are dead. Reports will show "He died"

My own policy for Online sites is to completely remove all living people before uploading, anywhere but my own site.

As always the Knowledge base has extensive notes on this and other options.
https://fhug.org.uk/kb/kb-article/expor ... out-media/
Jane
My Family History : My Photography "Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad."

User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2145
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by Mark1834 » 23 Jul 2023 18:57

Jane wrote:
23 Jul 2023 17:34
My own policy for Online sites is to completely remove all living people before uploading, anywhere but my own site
Agree - I actually go further than that, and usually omit the dead siblings and spouses of living people as well for obvious sensitivity reasons, using the Private flag and my own custom export routine (as in the Ancestry Sync plugin).
Mark Draper

avatar
KFN
Famous
Posts: 177
Joined: 20 Jun 2021 01:00
Family Historian: V7

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by KFN » 23 Jul 2023 19:07

In GEDCOM 5.5.1 the rule to mark an individual as dead when no additional information (place or date) is entered is:

1 DEAT Y

The flag should be removed when either the place or date is added. The following is invalid:

1 DEAT Y
2 DATE 2 MAY 1883

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27074
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by tatewise » 24 Jul 2023 10:16

You, don't need to do anything to add/remove the Y following the DEAT tag because FH deals with that GEDCOM detail.
(IMO it was confusing to call it the flag because it is not a FH Record Flag.)

If concerned about how other products interpret GEDCOM then it is best to add a Death Event even without any details.
Record Flags are a custom feature of FH and are not understood by other products.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

avatar
KFN
Famous
Posts: 177
Joined: 20 Jun 2021 01:00
Family Historian: V7

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by KFN » 24 Jul 2023 17:13

Tatewise,

So are you saying that the
1 DEAT Y

Is not understood by FH?

My primary software uses and understands this GEDCOM standard perfectly and in future releases of GEDCOM more facts will have this flag in the specification.

User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2145
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by Mark1834 » 24 Jul 2023 19:34

I'm not Tatewise, but the answer is "yes and no"...

When importing a GEDCOM, FH understands 1 DEAT Y, and creates a blank Death fact. However, it will also import 1 DEAT N and create a blank Death fact without complaining!

It stores a blank Death fact internally as 1 DEAT, and exports it in the same non-compliant form, even when GEDCOM 5.5.1 (Strict) is specified as the destination format.
Mark Draper

avatar
jelv
Superstar
Posts: 359
Joined: 03 Feb 2020 22:57
Family Historian: V7
Location: Mere, Wiltshire

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by jelv » 25 Jul 2023 09:39

Does Mike's export do it correctly? (not at a computer to try)
John Elvin

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27074
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by tatewise » 25 Jul 2023 10:01

I have just performed some fairly exhaustive tests.

FH seems to ignore anything following the 1 DEAT tag when importing so is tolerant to the Y case but does not remove Death facts without Y and without any subsidiary fields.

FH always exports Death facts that have no subsidiary fields by using the 1 DEAT Y construct as defined by the GEDCOM specifications for 5.5. and 5.5.1. My Export Gedcom File plugin does not do anything with DEAT facts because it assumes FH always gets it correct.

Mark, can you show evidence of FH not using the 1 DEAT Y construct?

However, none of this is relevant to the OP question.
The best option is to always add a Death fact to people who are considered to have died.
That is more reliably exported to other products than any FH Record Flag which is a non-standard custom FH feature..
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2145
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by Mark1834 » 25 Jul 2023 10:48

tatewise wrote:
25 Jul 2023 10:01
FH always exports Death facts that have no subsidiary fields by using the 1 DEAT Y construct as defined by the GEDCOM specifications for 5.5. and 5.5.1. My Export Gedcom File plugin does not do anything with DEAT facts because it assumes FH always gets it correct.

Mark, can you show evidence of FH not using the 1 DEAT Y construct?
Yep - When you add a new fact to an individual, it is created with blank Date and Place fields, and these are not removed until the project is next loaded into FH. If you export a GEDCOM in the same session where you added the fact, the blank fields are stripped out, but FH does not add the Y value, and exports it as 1 DEAT, even if the project has been saved. Subsequent sessions export correctly.

I would suggest your underlined qualifier is not relevant to real world use, as it is only the computer that distinguishes between empty and missing fields, not users. It's a relatively minor bug rather than a systematic non-compliance, but FH certainly doesn't "always get it correct".
Mark Draper

User avatar
AdrianBruce
Megastar
Posts: 1961
Joined: 09 Aug 2003 21:02
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire
Contact:

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by AdrianBruce » 25 Jul 2023 11:07

This is an extract of Mary (Dowling) in the Sample Project "before" my experiments

Code: Select all

0 @I84@ INDI
1 NAME Mary /(Dowling)/
2 SOUR @S27@
1 SEX F
1 BIRT
2 DATE CAL 1867
2 PLAC Kirkwall,Orkney, Scotland
2 SOUR @S27@
...
1 OCCU fisherwife
2 DATE 31 MAR 1901
2 PLAC Kirkwall,Orkney, Scotland
2 NOTE Employer, Worker, or Own account: Worker
2 SOUR @S27@
1 FAMS @F34@
1 _FLGS
2 __1901_UK_CENSU 1901 UK Census
1 CHAN
2 DATE 25 JUL 2023
3 TIME 11:49:17
I then opened the Project in FH, added a Death event for her with no data and closed down FH. This is then the same bit of the GEDCOM:

Code: Select all

0 @I84@ INDI
1 NAME Mary /(Dowling)/
2 SOUR @S27@
1 SEX F
1 BIRT
2 DATE CAL 1867
2 PLAC Kirkwall,Orkney, Scotland
2 SOUR @S27@
...
1 OCCU fisherwife
2 DATE 31 MAR 1901
2 PLAC Kirkwall,Orkney, Scotland
2 NOTE Employer, Worker, or Own account: Worker
2 SOUR @S27@
1 DEAT
1 FAMS @F34@
1 _FLGS
2 __1901_UK_CENSU 1901 UK Census
1 CHAN
2 DATE 25 JUL 2023
3 TIME 11:50:41
The change is the appearance of
1 DEAT

Note that there is no "Y" and the empty DEAT tag has not been removed. It even remains in the file after a 2nd load into FH followed by edit and save. I'm not sure how expected this behaviour is - I would have assumed before this thread, that FH would have created "1 DEAT Y" at some point in the proceedings.
Adrian

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27074
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by tatewise » 25 Jul 2023 11:13

Mark, I agree there is that minor bug, but in practice, it is unlikely to seriously affect any exported GEDCOM files, because performing an export immediately after creating 'empty' Death events is not a common occurrence.

Adrain, as Mark explained, if you open that Project in FH again and Save, then the 1 DEAT Y form is created.
The 'bug' only lasts for one Save and Open FH session.
I reported it long ago to CP.

You are welcome to report it again if you wish.

We are going way off topic.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

User avatar
AdrianBruce
Megastar
Posts: 1961
Joined: 09 Aug 2003 21:02
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire
Contact:

Re: Is there a 'Dead Flag'?

Post by AdrianBruce » 25 Jul 2023 11:44

tatewise wrote:
25 Jul 2023 11:13
... Adrian, as Mark explained, if you open that Project in FH again and Save, then the 1 DEAT Y form is created.
The 'bug' only lasts for one Save and Open FH session. ...
Yes - I've got the "Y" now. I think the first time I reopened it, I hadn't made any update before closing and so didn't have the "Y". Hence my puzzlement at Mark's statement. I've just made an update, saved it, checked and it's there.
Adrian

Post Reply