* Facts

Questions regarding use of any Version of Family Historian. Please ensure you have set your Version of Family Historian in your Profile. If your question fits in one of these subject-specific sub-forums, please ask it there.
User avatar
ColeValleyGirl
Megastar
Posts: 4852
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 22:02
Family Historian: V7
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire
Contact:

Re: Facts

Post by ColeValleyGirl » 27 Dec 2022 16:44

P.S. Your definition of youngsters is a bit imprecise... How young do you think we all are?

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27074
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Facts

Post by tatewise » 27 Dec 2022 17:43

Ditto. But I'll take it as a compliment that I'm still a youngster despite being in my 8th decade :lol:

BTW: It can be done in FH and in several different ways.
Most other genealogy software is much the same unless you know different?
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2145
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Facts

Post by Mark1834 » 27 Dec 2022 18:18

Prof Dame Sue Black pointed out in her excellent Royal Institution lecture last night that its all deterioration from your mid-30s :(. Doubt that there’s a single FHUG contributor on the rising side of the curve...
Mark Draper

User avatar
fhtess65
Megastar
Posts: 525
Joined: 15 Feb 2018 21:34
Family Historian: V7
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Contact:

Re: Facts

Post by fhtess65 » 27 Dec 2022 19:21

I'm curious about that too...being in my 6th decade...and always grateful for the feedback and advice I get here...
ColeValleyGirl wrote:
27 Dec 2022 16:44
P.S. Your definition of youngsters is a bit imprecise... How young do you think we all are?
---
Teresa Basińska Eckford
Librarian & family historian
http://writingmypast.wordpress.com
Researching: Spong, Ferdinando, Taylor, Lawley, Sinkins, Montgomery; Basiński, Hilferding, Ratowski, Paszkiewicz

User avatar
ColeValleyGirl
Megastar
Posts: 4852
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 22:02
Family Historian: V7
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire
Contact:

Re: Facts

Post by ColeValleyGirl » 27 Dec 2022 19:40

I'll confess to my heart being 21 but the rest of me is in my 7th decade.

User avatar
ADC65
Superstar
Posts: 376
Joined: 09 Jul 2007 10:27
Family Historian: V7

Re: Facts

Post by ADC65 » 27 Dec 2022 19:45

Mark1834 wrote:
27 Dec 2022 18:18
Doubt that there’s a single FHUG contributor on the rising side of the curve...
I'm 39 !!

(In hexadecimal :cry: )
Adrian Cook
Researching Cook, Summers, Phipps and Bradford, mainly in Wales and the South West of England

User avatar
Robert Jacobs
Famous
Posts: 111
Joined: 21 Mar 2015 18:03
Family Historian: V7
Location: Ellensburg, Washington, U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Facts

Post by Robert Jacobs » 28 Dec 2022 01:38

I'll be 84 next month and I keep wondering when I'm going to grow up.

avatar
Woodg
Famous
Posts: 119
Joined: 08 Oct 2019 09:28
Family Historian: V7
Location: Orange, Australia

Re: Facts

Post by Woodg » 28 Dec 2022 02:23

Robert Jacobs wrote:
28 Dec 2022 01:38
I'll be 84 next month and I keep wondering when I'm going to grow up.
Hopefully you never grow up! More fun that way.

User avatar
ergo
Gold
Posts: 11
Joined: 03 Aug 2022 08:38
Family Historian: V7
Location: Lancashire, England
Contact:

Re: Facts

Post by ergo » 28 Dec 2022 09:32

My original question was:
Why can't there be one category, with the opportunity to add as many or as few fields as you wish?
Derek

User avatar
ergo
Gold
Posts: 11
Joined: 03 Aug 2022 08:38
Family Historian: V7
Location: Lancashire, England
Contact:

Re: Facts

Post by ergo » 28 Dec 2022 09:35

I still think you are youngsters. If I make it, I';; be 90 in May.
Derek

User avatar
ColeValleyGirl
Megastar
Posts: 4852
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 22:02
Family Historian: V7
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire
Contact:

Re: Facts

Post by ColeValleyGirl » 28 Dec 2022 09:47

ergo wrote:
28 Dec 2022 09:32
My original question was:
Why can't there be one category, with the opportunity to add as many or as few fields as you wish?
Derek
Answered in the first response to you.
tatewise wrote:
21 Dec 2022 10:56
FH closely follows the GEDCOM specification and by doing so makes migration to and from other products fairly easy.
The more FH strays from the specification the more difficult such migration becomes.

Many other products distinguish between Events and Attributes as defined in GEDCOM.
In practice, there is little to stop you from using an Attribute as both an Event and an Attribute, except that the narrative Sentence Template definition may be a challenge to cope with both scenarios.
You could also define both a custom Event and a custom Attribute with the same or similar name. FH warns against it but it is allowed and fully supported.

There are several extra standard GEDCOM fields available for facts but they are not shown on the Facts tab so the All tab must be used. Adding custom fields would jeopardise migration to other products.
The recommended approach is to add labelled text to the Note field as explained in the FHUG Knowledge Base article Narrative Report Fact Sentence Templates under Custom Fact Fields.
In brief, for FH, full GEDCOM compliance is a major design goal (hence the two categories), but there are ways to achieve what you want within that constraint.

Post Reply