The dates are all in 2021, so the years are being displayed incorrectly.
- Capture.PNG (17.92 KiB) Viewed 517 times
* Possible bug in 7.0.11
-
garethhowell
- Gold
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 02 May 2019 14:26
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: St Neots, UK
- Contact:
Possible bug in 7.0.11
I happened to expand the "date" column in the list of Research records and noticed this:
The dates are all in 2021, so the years are being displayed incorrectly.
The dates are all in 2021, so the years are being displayed incorrectly.
Last edited by tatewise on 26 Feb 2022 11:15, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Corrected attachment display
Reason: Corrected attachment display
Gareth Howell
Researching HOWELL (Kent and South Wales), STILTZ/STILTS (London and Germany), DUNN (Norfolk)
Researching HOWELL (Kent and South Wales), STILTZ/STILTS (London and Germany), DUNN (Norfolk)
-
LornaCraig
- Megastar
- Posts: 2989
- Joined: 11 Jan 2005 17:36
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Re: Possible bug in 7.0.11
I have just tested this and it is working correctly for me. I suspect that when you first entered the date you typed the year as just '21', which FH interprets as 0021. Try adjusting the date in the Property Box of the Research note, entering the year in full.
Lorna