* Box marked "private" for living peole

Questions regarding use of any Version of Family Historian. Please ensure you have set your Version of Family Historian in your Profile. If your question fits in one of these subject-specific sub-forums, please ask it there.
Post Reply
User avatar
inchtalla
Platinum
Posts: 48
Joined: 18 Nov 2012 12:43
Family Historian: V7
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Box marked "private" for living peole

Post by inchtalla » 05 Feb 2022 10:55

Is it possible to create a chart which shows living people with a box marked "private"? I want to put charts on my website with out infringing on people's privacy.
Thanks

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27082
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Box marked "private" for living peole

Post by tatewise » 05 Feb 2022 11:32

Yes, that is possible by creating a custom Diagram Text Scheme.
However, the details depend on what criteria you intend to use to determine living people.
e.g. Record flag: Living?

Bear in mind that deceased close relatives in the Diagram will probably give away each Private person's identity.
e.g. Deceased parent, sibling & spouse Names and BMD details that can easily be used to reveal the Private persons.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

User avatar
inchtalla
Platinum
Posts: 48
Joined: 18 Nov 2012 12:43
Family Historian: V7
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Box marked "private" for living peole

Post by inchtalla » 05 Feb 2022 11:40

Thanks Mike. That's an interesting point - I intend to use the "living" flag as you say the private person can be worked out but I'll have given a level of privacy yet retain the information for the genealogist - it's a very very samll family in anycase.

User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2147
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Box marked "private" for living peole

Post by Mark1834 » 05 Feb 2022 11:54

The approach I use for Ancestry sync is to mark close relatives as “Private” using the built-in Private flag. They are then excluded automatically.
Mark Draper

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27082
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Box marked "private" for living peole

Post by tatewise » 05 Feb 2022 11:59

Use the Diagram > Options > Text tab and Clone a Text Scheme that is similar to what you need.
Use the Edit Text Scheme... features to Edit each Item and make it conditional on the Living or Private record flag not being set using the tick options lower right.
Add another custom Item that displays PRIVATE conditionally on the Living or Private record flag being set.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

User avatar
inchtalla
Platinum
Posts: 48
Joined: 18 Nov 2012 12:43
Family Historian: V7
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Box marked "private" for living peole

Post by inchtalla » 05 Feb 2022 12:04

Excellent - that's what I'll do.

Thanks to all.

User avatar
ColeValleyGirl
Megastar
Posts: 4853
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 22:02
Family Historian: V7
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire
Contact:

Re: Box marked "private" for living peole

Post by ColeValleyGirl » 05 Feb 2022 12:48

Another approach would be to use the 'Clean Living Persons' Plugin on a COPY of your project, which 'privatises' the underlying data everywhere, not just in the diagrams (in case you also want to use reports on your website.)

User avatar
davidf
Megastar
Posts: 951
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 19:14
Family Historian: V6.2
Location: UK

Re: Box marked "private" for living peole

Post by davidf » 05 Feb 2022 13:17

tatewise wrote:
05 Feb 2022 11:32
Bear in mind that deceased close relatives in the Diagram will probably give away each Private person's identity.
e.g. Deceased parent, sibling & spouse Names and BMD details that can easily be used to reveal the Private persons.
Rather than trying to identify living persons, you could have a generational cut-off. You identity the cut-off line such that there is a two generation gap between those who you would expect to be probably alive (until COVID that would have been my parents' and uncles' and aunts' generation) and the "most recent" person published in your tree (so I do not - at least by tree - publish details of grandparents and great uncles/aunts - but I am relatively sanguine about publishing details of my long dead great-grandparent's generation).

That will avoid accidentally publishing details of someone still alive (but very old) and will also minimise publishing details of the parents of someone who is still alive. The dead have no legal right to privacy, but their immediate offspring may feel a moral right for certain details of their parents to be kept private. Our curatorial drive is probably not an adequate excuse for over-riding such sentiments?

The "bottom line" of such a tree however probably contains enough detail for cousins to "recognise" a family relationship.

By applying a generational cut-off you also produce tidier trees - which matters when printing. However be aware that a single generational cut-off across a wide tree may not be sufficient because the individual on the extreme left could be 20 or more years older than the individual on the extreme right - despite being in the same "generational line".
David
Running FH 6.2.7. Under Wine on Linux (Ubuntu 22.04 LTS + LXDE 11)

User avatar
AdrianBruce
Megastar
Posts: 1962
Joined: 09 Aug 2003 21:02
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire
Contact:

Re: Box marked "private" for living peole

Post by AdrianBruce » 05 Feb 2022 20:39

I'd reinforce sentiments expressed above about a simplistic dead / living approach perhaps being inadequate.

Of course, if you have a small audience where everyone knows pretty much everyone else, then your objective is probably more like a gentle obscuring of matters, so as not to be too blatant about displaying what everyone knows anyway. Just good manners.

Ancestry do a good job of making boxes of living people private. However, in the majority of cases, when I'm looking at a tree of my contacts, as Mike says, I can generally work out who's who, especially if they are a DNA match and I know their Ancestry user name. And if there are deceased people within the current generation (to take David's point), I can actually feel a little embarrassed - e.g. the husband of one of my contacts had died while still young. She'd updated all his details, including his death date, so I was looking at all those details which, by implication, told me a lot about her.
Adrian

Post Reply