Place & Address and formatting codes in sentences
Posted: 12 Oct 2021 14:08
Hi,
I'm struggeling a bit with application of Place and Address. I'm not sure what the case is for UK, but In DK many records were previously organised occording to church paris, shire and county (not just church records, but also cencuses, land records etc). So my current use of Place is: town - parish - shire - county, and Address i use for todays postal address, if identifiable, or a name of a house or farm.
Any views on this?
By using "<>" aound a property name and some additional text, it is only shown if the property has a value., e.g. "{individual} lived <at {address}> <in {_place}>". This basically works fine, but if both have a value, the sentence can become very long, and hard to see in it's full extent, in verious FH dialogs and lists (lack of screen etate).
So my question is, if both have a value, can I make only a prefered property be shown, e.g. Address?
Regards
Erik
I'm struggeling a bit with application of Place and Address. I'm not sure what the case is for UK, but In DK many records were previously organised occording to church paris, shire and county (not just church records, but also cencuses, land records etc). So my current use of Place is: town - parish - shire - county, and Address i use for todays postal address, if identifiable, or a name of a house or farm.
Any views on this?
By using "<>" aound a property name and some additional text, it is only shown if the property has a value., e.g. "{individual} lived <at {address}> <in {_place}>". This basically works fine, but if both have a value, the sentence can become very long, and hard to see in it's full extent, in verious FH dialogs and lists (lack of screen etate).
So my question is, if both have a value, can I make only a prefered property be shown, e.g. Address?
Regards
Erik