Post
by Gary_G » 26 Mar 2023 01:49
I read this thread with great interest. Many of the comments on the struggles of other refugees from RootsMagic resonated strongly with me.
I'd call myself a moderate lumper. In RootsMagic, I wrote all my own templates, so it was easy to closely follow the EE-style. My level of lumping was based on consolidating the parts of a citation were reliably invariant and putting the rest into the detail part. So; I really didn't see much of the Lumper-related rework I saw mentioned in the thread. I'm still not quite sure that potential rework is the real issue for me.
However; FH7 isn't RootsMagic. It's obviously splitter-oriented. No issue with that. However; when my RM9 database was directly imported into FH7, I quickly found out that I could no longer be even a moderate lumper and follow the EE-style. Some fields could not be used wherever one wished. Very well, I figured, I'll change to splitting and be able to follow EE-style. Not so fast... The existing plugin to split lumped citations didn't seem to split my directly-imported data. I have full confidence that, had the plugin author sufficient time, they could produce something that would solve my problem. However; if they are as busy as I, then this will likely take a while.
So; I'm not really sure what to do, now. Do I continue as a Lumper and possibly dig a bigger hole (and leave EE-style behind), wait for a plugin to be written/upgraded, or do I re-enter all my citations in order to work with the way FH7 was designed to be used?
None of these options is particularly appealing. So; time for another coffee ...or maybe something stronger....
Gary Gauthier
Hunting History in the Wild!