* relation to head in census

Questions regarding use of any Version of Family Historian. Please ensure you have set your Version of Family Historian in your Profile. If your question fits in one of these subject-specific sub-forums, please ask it there.
Post Reply
User avatar
jbrooks
Famous
Posts: 130
Joined: 20 Jan 2009 23:13
Family Historian: V6.2
Location: UK

relation to head in census

Post by jbrooks » 25 May 2018 00:17

I am very happy with FH charts and relationship to head in census. However, I am wondering if I could do this better.

Below William Brooks Dowsett is the son of William Brooks Dowsett.
rel to head.JPG
rel to head.JPG (129.49 KiB) Viewed 4450 times
Gill, Cole, Ruggles are lodgers whereas in FH facts they would appear to be related from a family perspective; please see below:-
cole.JPG
cole.JPG (161.82 KiB) Viewed 4450 times
Is there a better way for me to record this from a historical perspective?

Regards Jonathan

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27082
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: relation to head in census

Post by tatewise » 25 May 2018 09:45

FH focusses on Family Genealogical relationships, and has no standard mechanism for non-family connections such as Lodger or Servant.

When entering the details of Gill, Cole & Ruggles you have chosen to add them as Sons of William Brooks Dowsett senior.
FH would not do that on its own accord.

In the Focus window, I suggest you focus on William Brooks Dowsett senior, with Gill, Cole & Ruggles shown as Children.
Right-click on each such Child (who is actually a Lodger) and choose Unlink Record.
Those people will become unrelated Individuals but still associated with the family household via the Census Source Citations.

There are advanced techniques using Associated Persons or Fact Witnesses to form closer connections between the family members and the lodgers, but since they are only unrelated lodgers why bother?
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

avatar
Gowermick
Megastar
Posts: 1629
Joined: 13 Oct 2015 07:22
Family Historian: V7
Location: Swansea

Re: relation to head in census

Post by Gowermick » 25 May 2018 11:32

I agree with Mike, if they are not related don’t add them. The only thing I would do in this case, is to add a note against the head of household, stating the fact that these individuals were lodging with him in 1871, just in case they turn out to be related :D

Many a time I have come across someone who had a visitor staying with them, who later turned out to be distant relative or even a future spouse!
Mike Loney

Website http://www.loney.tribalpages.com
http://www.mickloney.tribalpages.com

User avatar
jbrooks
Famous
Posts: 130
Joined: 20 Jan 2009 23:13
Family Historian: V6.2
Location: UK

Re: relation to head in census

Post by jbrooks » 07 Jun 2018 19:58

Thanks Mike, nice web site and I would be interested in how you generated this as I would like to "publish" one day. Can this be used to link FH media files?

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27082
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: relation to head in census

Post by tatewise » 07 Jun 2018 20:05

TribalPages has significant omissions, as explained in plugins:help:export_gedcom_file:tpt_tribalpages_tree|> Export Gedcom File ~ (TPT) TribalPages Tree.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

avatar
Gowermick
Megastar
Posts: 1629
Joined: 13 Oct 2015 07:22
Family Historian: V7
Location: Swansea

Re: relation to head in census

Post by Gowermick » 07 Jun 2018 20:34

Jbrooks,
You give me too much credit :D . It is Tribalpages itself, that creates the website, which I then tailored with banners, introduction and colours. All I had to do was upload a Gedcom, Tribalpages did the rest!
I use the site as a backup for my research, which also allows me to share it with others. It is also free for a basic tree, (a good selling point), and for a reasonably small fee, you can get an upgraded site, with more facilities, including extra media allowed.
Go to http://tribalpages.com/ to find out more.
Mike Loney

Website http://www.loney.tribalpages.com
http://www.mickloney.tribalpages.com

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27082
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: relation to head in census

Post by tatewise » 08 Jun 2018 09:48

Jonathan, if you are interested in published websites, take a look at links:index|> Member Web Sites.
The possibilities will depend on your budget. Some are free, but most are not.
Free trees are also available without a subscription from Ancestry, FindMyPast, and ZoomPast.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

Post Reply