Witnesses in narrative reports
Posted: 11 Nov 2015 12:55
I'm new to FH and so far I'm very impressed, although there's a bit of a learning curve! There are a couple of issues I can't find an answer to in the forum or elsewhere - can anyone point me in the right direction?
Firstly, where I have created my various GRO birth certificates as separate sources, the person who registered the birth in each case is entered (via AS) as an informant. This adds a witness fact to the individual record of the person concerned. So far, so good. When I then create (for example) a narrative ancestor report, I see this witness fact is included. I don't really want it in there though - it's particularly annoying in families with multiple children and you end up with half a page of "x was an informant for the birth of y..." statements for every other person in the report.
Is there a way to specify that this (or any other) fact type be excluded from any given report? As far as I can see, the only options to block the sentence are to delete the underlying fact (which I don't want to do), or to find and manually edit the sentence for each and every instance, which would be monstrously time consuming and frustrating.
My second issue also concerns report texts and relates to my biological great-grandfather. Essentially unknown, he is nevertheless in my tree as I do have a very small amount of information about him that I want to record, although no name or dates (having him there also helps to better chart the relationship between my late grandmother and her half-siblings). However, to be blunt, the individual in question raped my great grandmother while she was working in his family's domestic service and my grandmother was the result. Because of this, and because I have so little information on him anyway, I have the man set to private as I don't want him popping up in reports as having been the spouse of, or in a relationship with, or having "met" my grandmother. That's the kind of thing that would give some relatives a fit of the vapours - and rightly so.
Having set him to private I have found that, as intended, there is now no mention of my great-grandfather in a narrative ancestor report. However, against my great-grandmother there was a sentence fragment relating to being in some kind of a relationship - the report had dropped the individual but left half a sentence behind. I have found that if I switch off the option to generate automatic text for missing facts this sentence fragment disappears. However, in doing that I also lose all the fancy padding elsewhere in the report that was doing a pretty impressive job ("not much info recorded about x" (or words to that effect) and so on). Such a pity. Can anyone think of any workarounds that would allow me to chop just this one instance of automatically generated text, while leaving the remaining 99.9% elsewhere in the report untouched? Does this sound like a bug I should report to Calico?
Firstly, where I have created my various GRO birth certificates as separate sources, the person who registered the birth in each case is entered (via AS) as an informant. This adds a witness fact to the individual record of the person concerned. So far, so good. When I then create (for example) a narrative ancestor report, I see this witness fact is included. I don't really want it in there though - it's particularly annoying in families with multiple children and you end up with half a page of "x was an informant for the birth of y..." statements for every other person in the report.
Is there a way to specify that this (or any other) fact type be excluded from any given report? As far as I can see, the only options to block the sentence are to delete the underlying fact (which I don't want to do), or to find and manually edit the sentence for each and every instance, which would be monstrously time consuming and frustrating.
My second issue also concerns report texts and relates to my biological great-grandfather. Essentially unknown, he is nevertheless in my tree as I do have a very small amount of information about him that I want to record, although no name or dates (having him there also helps to better chart the relationship between my late grandmother and her half-siblings). However, to be blunt, the individual in question raped my great grandmother while she was working in his family's domestic service and my grandmother was the result. Because of this, and because I have so little information on him anyway, I have the man set to private as I don't want him popping up in reports as having been the spouse of, or in a relationship with, or having "met" my grandmother. That's the kind of thing that would give some relatives a fit of the vapours - and rightly so.
Having set him to private I have found that, as intended, there is now no mention of my great-grandfather in a narrative ancestor report. However, against my great-grandmother there was a sentence fragment relating to being in some kind of a relationship - the report had dropped the individual but left half a sentence behind. I have found that if I switch off the option to generate automatic text for missing facts this sentence fragment disappears. However, in doing that I also lose all the fancy padding elsewhere in the report that was doing a pretty impressive job ("not much info recorded about x" (or words to that effect) and so on). Such a pity. Can anyone think of any workarounds that would allow me to chop just this one instance of automatically generated text, while leaving the remaining 99.9% elsewhere in the report untouched? Does this sound like a bug I should report to Calico?