To Move Address into Place Record - or Not
Posted: 12 Oct 2015 13:15
I have a growing number of photos of "places" (house, street, church, cemetery, factory etc) which are relevant to more than one person, sometimes many people, and at different times in their lives. At the moment I have most of those "places" are named in the Address record, with their village, town, county etc in the Place record.
Of course, at the moment, FH doesn't allow multimedia records to be attached to Addresses, only to Places. I know that some people have moved all their addresses into the Place record to overcome this.
I'm thinking about doing this, and extending my Place records from 4 fields to 6 or 7. What are the potential downsides of doing it? One thing that springs to mind is mapping, particularly where (for example) St. Jame's might be a church and/or a parish/district.
Of course, at the moment, FH doesn't allow multimedia records to be attached to Addresses, only to Places. I know that some people have moved all their addresses into the Place record to overcome this.
I'm thinking about doing this, and extending my Place records from 4 fields to 6 or 7. What are the potential downsides of doing it? One thing that springs to mind is mapping, particularly where (for example) St. Jame's might be a church and/or a parish/district.