* GRO Registration Data & Place Data

Questions regarding use of any Version of Family Historian. Please ensure you have set your Version of Family Historian in your Profile. If your question fits in one of these subject-specific sub-forums, please ask it there.
Post Reply
avatar
jbtapscott
Superstar
Posts: 483
Joined: 19 Nov 2014 17:52
Family Historian: V7
Location: Corfu, Greece
Contact:

GRO Registration Data & Place Data

Post by jbtapscott » 02 Sep 2015 17:32

Just wondering what others do in respect of the Registration District, etc., on a Birth / Marriage / Death GRO Index record - do you consider this to also be the Place of Birth, etc, or do you leave the Place in the Birth fact blank on FH. From what I have read, the vast majority of BMD's are registered "locally" and therefore it is probably (?) fairly safe to assume that the Registration District is the locale of birth (or M or D).

Until now I have always ignored the Registration District (in terms of the Birth, etc., fact Place) but I am just wondering if I should perhaps treat it as the "real" Place unless I have information to the contrary?.
Brent Tapscott ~ researching the Tapscott and Wallace family history
Tapscott & Wallace family tree

avatar
AnneEast
Superstar
Posts: 306
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 23:39
Family Historian: V6.2
Location: Cumbria

Re: GRO Registration Data & Place Data

Post by AnneEast » 02 Sep 2015 17:40

I use the registration district as the place the event took place if I have no other information. So that I know it is only a registration dustrict I call it eg. Patrington (RD), YKS. This distinguishes it from Patrington, YKS, where
I know the event did actually take place in the village.
Anne

User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 27084
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: GRO Registration Data & Place Data

Post by tatewise » 02 Sep 2015 17:51

Yes, I use a similar scheme to record the Place the Event happened as the Registration District.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry

User avatar
mjashby
Megastar
Posts: 692
Joined: 23 Oct 2004 10:45
Family Historian: V7
Location: Yorkshire

Re: GRO Registration Data & Place Data

Post by mjashby » 02 Sep 2015 20:34

I also tend to use Registration District, County as a proxy place of Birth/Death/Marriage until/unless I have a more accurate location. The only 'problems' I've encountered and have to manage are those Registration Districts that cross County Boundaries and a few that aren't 'true' place names. For much older records, I also tend to use 'the Parish of' where the only source information available is a Baptism/Burial Register Entry.

User avatar
Wilfreda99
Diamond
Posts: 97
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 09:29
Family Historian: V7
Location: Beds/Bucks border - England

Re: GRO Registration Data & Place Data

Post by Wilfreda99 » 03 Sep 2015 09:38

I tend to leave the place and address fields blank, unless I am pretty sure that they coincide with the registration area. The quarter date is a clue and then I put the details of place, volume and page in the note. The people in my current project are born married and died in my village, but the registration district is 7 miles away in a different county. In fact thinking about it I probably should go back and review all such situations in my other projects, because the registration district name has often been different from the place. Although I suppose it only tends to apply ultimately to the more peripheral people for whom you don't later splash out on a certificate.

Post Reply