Family Historian User Group

I have tested a reimport of my TMG project in FH 708.
It's in Norwegian and some tags/facts are user defined with Norwegian names and also shown as Facts in Norwegian in FH.

Just started again, now saying 764 minutes ...
I just took a screen shot with windows' Clip-and-draw.

screenshots from the run: The results were OK, but I still don't understand the subset of 23 included.
If I did not select the 23, there are 127000x127000 comparisons?

A project with 127000 individuals.
Selected a subset of only 23 records.
Plugin says Estimated run time is only a few seconds, but it took over 50 minutes.

Why this long time?
Why not search only the 23 records?

I can't find the change dates from TMG in the FH gedcom file, only new dates when FH is changing data.

1 CHAN
2 DATE 15 JAN 2021
3 TIME 17:29:50

Thank you Leslie for information/example. Here is another example from my data - TMG + FH + RM7 - showing that RM7 does it correctly with the direct import from TMG. TMG 9.05: Skjermbilde 2021-07-11 103718.png FH 7.07 - second Name is "Flink Flink", wrong! Skjermbilde 2021-07-11 103916.png RM 7.6.5 ...

I imagine there are no TMG direct import options for that feature. So you need to discuss it with CP via their http://www.calico-pie.com/osticket/open.php Support Tickets. Done. With test project and screen shots. This is a very serious problem for FH since RootsMagic has not this kind of issue. It...

Direct import from TMG.
Persons having a Name-Variation name in addition to their Name have lost their Given Name.
Mildred gets Finstad Finstad as her Name-Variation in FH:

KFN wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2021 23:46

Was this imported via GEDCOM or some other way? In GEDCOM three options are possible for the “Adopted by” information: [ HUSB | WIFE | BOTH ]

Direct import from TMG.

As far as I can see from your screenshots and the small test project, the Adoptive Parents are correct. They don't have the same surname as the adopted child (as expected). Whereas, the Biological Parents father does have the same surname as the child. I suspect what is confusing you is the order o...

After importing an adopted person from TMG the biological parents are wrong, they are shown as adoptive persons with "Relationship to Parents" = adopted.
Small test project from TMG attached.

See month+year there, but difficult to find.
Should have been shown here, of course...https://www.family-historian.co.uk/down ... ee-upgrade

there are no dates for the versions here https://www.family-historian.co.uk/down ... ee-upgrade

I now found the plugin, trying it.

I've looked and read Help but can't find any way to search for duplicated persons.
Of course it must be here..?

torleiffh wrote:Why is this site not secure?
http://www.family-historian.co.uk/

This FHUG site is safe: https://www.fhug.org.uk

Today I found that the URL has changed to https://www.family-historian.co.uk/
And Chrome says "SAFE"

Why is this site not secure?
http://www.family-historian.co.uk/

This FHUG site is safe: https://www.fhug.org.uk

Thanks again, and I asked the same question over a year ago.
Still the FH list is not as helpful as the name/index list in Legacy9 and RootsMagic where the _same column_ has _both_ the birth name and married name sorted alphabetically.

Is it possible to show persons listed by their alternate names in the Individual records list?
In alphabetical order; a) by main name and b) by alternate name.

t haugodegard, norway

Thanks for the 2 alternatives, they worked in a way, but I'm not at all satisfied that FH does not show ALL names in it's standard Individual Names list. There is a Filter option in the Individuals list; "Alternate names". But it does not work, showing no alternate names. TMG has shown ALL names (al...

I have a project with royal families of Norway and UK (from my TMG database). a) I can't find out how to show king Olav's alternate name "Alexander Edward Christian Frederik" in the sorted names list, it seems not possible? b) It seems that the Source of Olav's alternate name is NOT imported from TM...

TMG sorts all names in the way the user wants, like Norwegian. FH should look at this Unicode report: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/ "This report is the specification of the Unicode Collation Algorithm (UCA), which details how to compare two Unicode strings while remaining conformant to the re...

Thanks for the answer, but "alphabetical order" is not the same in Norway, Sweden, Denmark and UK, not to mention German or Spanish. TMG has a "Collate sequence" under Preferences where we can select NORDAN which is the sorting for Norway+Denmark. I asked for plans to translate FH to other languages...

Yes, I now get the Norwegian date format dd.mm.yyyy in reports by using ABBREV3.
Thank you.

The sorting of names starting with the 3 last characters (æøå -ÆØÅ) in Norwegian is not 100% correct.
Names like "Aase" is not sorted together with "Åse".

This is not a problem in TMG, which also has correct sorting in Swedish and Danish.