Family Historian User Group

Thank you also from me!
It works as I wished. I wasn't able to try it sooner, because my 5-months-old didn't give me much free time today [smile]

I really appreciate your help!

tatewise, you trully are an expert! May I ask you just for one 'upgrade'? Is it possible in Mar: section to avoid the comma at the end of a person's name - just where I have no Marriage Date? For not displaying comma after Unmarried Couples, I deleted the last part, now it is: =TextIf(IsEmpty(%INDI....

Thank you, tatewise, you are very kind to help me so much! However, this is still not the way I'd like it to be… It is good point that when I enter the Death Date the condition falls. I haven't thought of that. But I would like to incorporate something like your idea in formula which describes marri...

Thank you, Peter! It makes sense. Now my question is how to incorporate your sollution in the main formula - to be connected with marriage status. To be honest, my main problem is, that I don't understand the formula (the complicated one)- why is written the way it is. I tried to analyze it but I go...

In my text scheme I have a custom item to show a marriage status and where a couple is divorced it shows 'Married (and Divorced): XY, Date of marriage'. Now I would like to incoroporate in existing text scheme a code for widowed people so that it would say: ' Married (Widowed): XY, Date of marriage ...

I figured it out!!! [grin] Since additional child needs a parent (which is additional spouse-even if unknown), I do not have to bother with children. Then I joined parents and spouses (to avoid duplication of symbols in some cases): =TextIf(IsTrue((RelationCode([''],%INDI%,SPOUSE_END,1) = 1) and Exi...

1. When I do so, it shows only the last marriage date, not from the first spouse.

2. Please, what about the symbol for other spouse's relatives?

Thank you again, tatewise, it looks much more appealing! As I asked before, do you happen to know if a code like this exists also for children and other spouses of a non-relative? And a question out of the topic - I created my own text scheme. Marriage info is shown only in spouse's box. How can I p...

I tried 'inversing condition for icon' way and tatewise's way, but I found that the 'Y' textsheme way is the closest to what I want. Inversing condition is also ok (but I would rather have people with families marked, not without). In tatewise's case is problem that the diagram doesn't adapt to chan...

Works well![smile] If you come with a solution for an icon for non-relatives, please, let me know, because I prefer that option, but the one with text scheme is OK, too. Just one more thing - as you mentioned possibility of inversing the condition for icon - how do I do that? Really thank you a lot ...

Jane, thank you a lot!!! [smile]
Just one more thing if I can bother you [oops] As I set the icon the way you told me, the icon is displayed also by my relatives (almost everyone in my tree has it, because they have parents, right?). Is it possible to set it just to non-relatives?

I ment something like this example from Geni.com. By Zoran there is a green tree that means there is his family tree behind. I want this feature so badly because I find it a waste of time clicking on everybody just to see if they have relatives or not. http://www.fhug.rjt.org.uk/images/uploads/test1...

Thank you both for quick response! Unfortunately, that was not what I was looking for. Let me write an example. I do not want 'Everyone diagram', it is too confusing. 'All Relatives Diagram' works for me. But my mother has approx. 25 cousins with spouses (they are all on the diagram as they should b...

I am new to Family Historian. I read the Book, tried in Help topics, searched the forum, but I have not found the solution to my problem. Is it possible to add an expansion button for non-relative branches (e.g. for my brother-in-law's parents, my sister-in-law husband's family...) in 'All Relatives...