Family Historian User Group

Hi Nick

Many thanks, I wondered if it was something along those lines.

I'll just add the deleted stuff to the text already in there and that should make sure the info doesn't get lost[smile]!

Cheers.

John.

I have just upgraded from version 3.1.2 to 4.0 and the upgrade threw out a few lines of my GEDCOM which appeared to work OK in version 3.1.2. I am not sure if the new version perhaps has a different GEDCOM check algorithm but am slightly mystified as to why the lines in question appeared OK in 3.1.2...

Is there an accepted way to record bigamous marriages? I have one which was later dissolved and the husband then married (legally!) the woman he had earlier married bigamously. I have not tried to enter the details as yet as I still have some research to do but I presume I can just enter the marriag...